Tomash Brechko writes: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 18:33:37 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > > We do understand what you're saying, and simply repeating the same > > thing doesn't help. > > > > I think we should wait to see what the C++ working group comes up with > > and consider implementing that, rather than some ad-hoc gcc-specific > > proposal. > > Aha, but repeating worked. This is the first time someone agrees that > the problem lies not entirely in the programmer's code. Thank you! > :))
Err, not exactly. :) See http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/c++mm/why_undef.html Andrew.
