gcc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Clark via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Matz via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Matz via Gcc
• [GSoC PATCH] libiberty: Add demangler recursion limit test Jialong Wang via Gcc
• [GSoC] Interested in the cp-demangle non-recursive project Jialong Wang via Gcc
  • [GSoC] Interested in the cp-demangle non-recursive project jerrywang183--- via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Interested in the cp-demangle non-recursive project Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Interested in the cp-demangle non-recursive project jerrywang183--- via Gcc
• Curious about GCC language support Terry Bennett via Gcc
  • Re: Curious about GCC language support Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Re: Draft GSoC 2026 Proposal: CPython API Checking, PR 107646 David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Draft GSoC 2026 Proposal: CPython API Checking, PR 107646 David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Draft GSoC 2026 Proposal: CPython API Checking, PR 107646 Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Draft GSoC 2026 Proposal: CPython API Checking, PR 107646 David Malcolm via Gcc
• gcc-16-20260315 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-15-20260314 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jerry D via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jeffrey Law via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Richard Earnshaw (foss) via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Christopher Albert via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Christopher Albert via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jeffrey Law via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jeffrey Law via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Christopher Albert via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Christopher Albert via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Patrick Palka via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes NightStrike via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes DJ Delorie via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Christopher Albert via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jerry D via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jerry D via Gcc
• [GSOC 2026] Extending GCC Static Analyzer and POSIX API checking Saish Kambali via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260313 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [GSoC 2026] Exploring GCC Static Analyzer and POSIX API checking Saish Kambali via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC 2026] Exploring GCC Static Analyzer and POSIX API checking David Malcolm via Gcc
• Sourceware Open Office, Fri 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Sourceware Open Office, Fri 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• gcc-13-20260312 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Vineet Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode H.J. Lu via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Vineet Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode H.J. Lu via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Vineet Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode H.J. Lu via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Vineet Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode H.J. Lu via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Vineet Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Vineet Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Jeffrey Law via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Jeffrey Law via Gcc
• Re: Submission of Experiment-0 Report – VM Oversubscription & Tracing Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• Re: [GSoC2026][Experiment-0] Part1~2 Writeup Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC2026][Experiment-0] Part1~2 Writeup Yuao Ma via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC2026][Experiment-0] Part1~2 Writeup Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• GSoC 2026: Static Analyzer and format-string shulin gonsalves via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Static Analyzer and format-string David Malcolm via Gcc
• Requesting guidance on GSoC 2026 Arnav Soni via Gcc
  • Re: Requesting guidance on GSoC 2026 Martin Jambor
• [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Julian Waters via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Julian Waters via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Martin Jambor
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Joseph Tay via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Joseph Tay via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Martin Jambor
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Joseph Tay via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Martin Jambor
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Joseph Tay via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets LIU Hao via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Julian Waters via Gcc
• GSoC 2026 - Project Selection Guidance CHIKI Badreddine via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026 - Project Selection Guidance Martin Jambor
• GCC 16.0.1 Status Report (2026-03-09) Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-16-20260308 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Tobias Burnus
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Tobias Burnus
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
• gcc-15-20260307 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260306 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [GSoC] Interest in extending the static analyzer Egas Ribeiro via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Interest in extending the static analyzer David Malcolm via Gcc
• GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) David Malcolm via Gcc
• Smart phone Fundi Zombie via Gcc
• gcc-13-20260305 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GSoC: Interest in libgomp Scheduler Guided OpenMP Project vatsal darji via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC: Interest in libgomp Scheduler Guided OpenMP Project Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC: Interest in libgomp Scheduler Guided OpenMP Project Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• Progress Update on Experiment-0 Roy Fru via Gcc
  • Re: Progress Update on Experiment-0 Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• GSoC OpenMP Questions Stefan Weigl-Bosker via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC OpenMP Questions Tobias Burnus
  • Re: GSoC OpenMP Questions Stefan Weigl-Bosker via Gcc
• GSoC - Interested in GCC Compiler Work CHIKI Badreddine via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC - Interested in GCC Compiler Work David Malcolm via Gcc
• Re: SFrame for C++ coroutine stack traces Indu Bhagat via Gcc
  • Re: SFrame for C++ coroutine stack traces Mehrdad Niknami via Gcc
• ᴀᴄᴄᴏᴜɴᴛ ʟɪᴍɪᴛᴇᴅ ɴᴇᴛꜰʟɪx via Gcc
• gcc-16-20260301 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Prospective GSoC 2026 Contributor – Interested in Contributing to Extend the static analysis pass Virginia Hany via Gcc
  • Re: Prospective GSoC 2026 Contributor – Interested in Contributing to Extend the static analysis pass Martin Jambor
• gcc-15-20260228 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260227 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20260226 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GNAT Feature Proposal: Protected Subprogram Atomic Trampolines Liam Powell via Gcc
  • Re: GNAT Feature Proposal: Protected Subprogram Atomic Trampolines Eric Botcazou via Gcc
  • Re: GNAT Feature Proposal: Protected Subprogram Atomic Trampolines Liam Powell via Gcc
• Gcc - ITB Berlin 2026 Arabella Skinner via Gcc
  • Gcc - ITB Berlin 2026 Trinity Archer via Gcc
  • Gcc - ITB Berlin 2026 Kade Carver via Gcc
• Starting patch review wiki Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
  • Re: Starting patch review wiki David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Starting patch review wiki Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Starting patch review wiki Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Error ocurrs within building mysql 8.0.25 ywgrit via Gcc
  • Re: Error ocurrs within building mysql 8.0.25 Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Error ocurrs within building mysql 8.0.25 ywgrit via Gcc
• Interested in Libgomp GSoC Project Roy Fru via Gcc
  • Re: Interested in Libgomp GSoC Project Roy Fru via Gcc
  • Loading bytes into SI register James Boulton via Gcc
  • Re: Interested in Libgomp GSoC Project Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• [RFC] Builtins for C++26 integer atomic reductions Soumya AR via Gcc
  • Re: [Ping][RFC] Builtins for C++26 integer atomic reductions Soumya AR via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Builtins for C++26 integer atomic reductions Soumya AR via Gcc
• RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Yair Lenga via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Yair Lenga via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Yair Lenga via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Tom Tromey
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Yair Lenga via Gcc
  • RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Yair Lenga via Gcc
  • Re: RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Yair Lenga via Gcc
  • RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration - relationship to lva-larger-then Yair Lenga via Gcc
  • Re: RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration - relationship to lva-larger-then Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration - relationship to lva-larger-then Yair Lenga via Gcc
  • Re: RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration - relationship to lva-larger-then Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration - relationship to lva-larger-then David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration - relationship to lva-larger-then Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration - relationship to lva-larger-then David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration - relationship to lva-larger-then Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration - relationship to lva-larger-then David Brown via Gcc
  • WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS for bitwise operators? James Boulton via Gcc
  • Re: WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS for bitwise operators? Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • RE: WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS for bitwise operators? James Boulton via Gcc
  • Re: RFC follow-up: attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: RFC (C only): [[gnu::allow_vla]] attribute to suppress -Wvla on a single declaration David Brown via Gcc
• Invitation to join Search Strategy Growth Network Google Groups via Gcc
• gcc-16-20260222 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Expressing my interest in contributing to the "Rust Front-End" proposal at GSoC 2026 Fisnik Hasani
  • Re: Expressing my interest in contributing to the "Rust Front-End" proposal at GSoC 2026 Martin Jambor
  • Re: Expressing my interest in contributing to the "Rust Front-End" proposal at GSoC 2026 Arthur Cohen via Gcc
• gcc-15-20260221 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• New backend development questions James Boulton via Gcc
• GSoC 2026: Interest in libgomp Optimizations for Scheduler-Guided OpenMP Execution in Cloud VMs Aryan Jain via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Interest in libgomp Optimizations for Scheduler-Guided OpenMP Execution in Cloud VMs Aryan Jain via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Interest in libgomp Optimizations for Scheduler-Guided OpenMP Execution in Cloud VMs Josef Melcr via Gcc

• Earlier messages
• Later messages