On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:17:00PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Dec 19, 2007 4:32 PM, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you want an additional > > list of bugs that are being actively worked on (and labelled as such), > > that's fine (although I have no idea how that list would be useful). > > Let's take a bug as an example case: http://gcc.gnu.org/23835 > > Here, there is a bug report about a huge compile time increase. The > release manager decided that this was not a release blocker for GCC > 4.2. So it was marked P4, and it disappeared from the radar for GCC > 4.3 for everyone who only looks at the "Serious regressions".
Right. I tend to look at the list of "All regressions" for that reason. I have also bookmarked about 20 PRs that I'm likely to work on. It does not come as a surprice to me that one size doesn't fit all. The list of "Serious regressions" just gives you a peek over the release manager's shoulders. I use it mainly as an indication of how far away regressions only mode is. -- Rask Ingemann Lambertsen Danish law requires addresses in e-mail to be logged and stored for a year
