On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 02:32:28PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:26:29PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> > In addition, improvements to the GCC infrastructure allows several
> > existing warning flags new ability to spot problematic code.
> >
> > Is this sentence okay? I'm not a native speaker, so I might miss a
> > nuance here.
>
> No, it's badly worded, but fixing it seems to be more than a matter of
> rephrasing. It's basically saying that existing warning flags will
> produce warnings, but I'd prefer to see something more specific.
^- s/warnings/additional warnings/, or maybe "fewer false
positives" as well.
