On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 10:34 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > H.J. Lu keeps ira-branch merge more fresh than trunk. But the lag is only > > I won't apply any non-IRA related patches to ira-merge branch so > that you can get a fair comparison for IRA without regressions > introduced by other changes. > > > 1-3 days usually because gcc community and RA reviewers are very responsive. > > So I don't see a big difference in using ira-merge and trunk. I'd only > > recommend to apply patch > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg00427.html > > > > first because it is critical for performance but I don't know when it will > > be approved. > > > > I checked this patch into ira-merge branch.
I've verifired applu and facerec against the ira-merge branch. The numbers are just as bad as trunk. So, apparently, the last patch didn't improve performance on those benchmarks. Any other ideas you'd like me to try on IRA? Thanks, Luis
