On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:56 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Richard Guenther > <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:34 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have been running functional tests on SPEC CPU 2K/2006 >>> on Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64 at -O2 and -O3. We'd like to >>> report pass and regressions. We may send SPEC CPU >>> regressions to >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/ >>> >>> But for passes, there is no suitable place to report. >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ >>> >>> is for gcc testsuite. If I send SPEC CPU pass to it, it >>> may be buried by normal test results. >>> >>> Any suggestions. >> >> Put it on a website and link to it from >> http://gcc.gnu.org/benchmarks/ >> > > My website isn't visible to public. Also it isn't really benchmark since > I only run functional tests. My reports only show pass or which tests > failed.
I see. I agree that gcc-regression is appropriate for FAILs then. Is it important to have PASSes available somewhere? (you can assume PASSes if there are no FAIL reports). Richard. > > -- > H.J. >
