What about allowing for more backports from the graphite branch if this drags out for an extended period of time? In particular, I am thinking of those changes in graphite branch that might reduce those cases where -fgraphite-identity degrades the performance of the resulting code. Jack
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:10:07AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > NightStrike wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2...@1:58 PM, Joseph S. Myers > > <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > >> Given the SC request we need to stay in Stage 4 rather than trying to work > >> around it. > > > > What if GCC went back to stage 3 until the issue is resolved, thus > > opening the door for a number of stage3-type patches that don't affect > > 1) licensing and 2) plugin frameworks, but are merely bug fixes which > > would have long been shaken out by now. > > No, n...@all. The only benefit we're having from this is that GCC 4.4 > should be quite stable already in GCC 4.4.0, let's not destroy this one too. > > Paolo