"Paul Edwards" <mutazi...@gmail.com> writes:

> 2. If the normal way to do things is to parse the make -n output
> with perl etc, that's fine, I'll do it that way.  I was just wondering
> if the proper way was to incorporate the logic into a Makefile
> rule and get that rule repeatedly executed rather than just
> having a simple "echo".  It seems to me that having a generic
> rule to execute an external script would be neater???

I'm not sure what you are suggesting here, but I do know that it
wouldn't make sense for us to change the gcc Makefile to use a rule
which executes an external script.

The "normal way to do things" is to use GNU make.  I think you are the
first person trying to build gcc without it.

Ian

Reply via email to