Paolo Carlini wrote: > Thus, what's the point of submitter fiddling with those Bugzilla > fields? Putting some sort of psychological pressure on people actually > working on fixing the bugs?
Well, that's true when it comes to high priorities, but the submitter should have the opportunity to specify lower priorities. For instance a typo is a bug which should be fixed, but certainly it isn't a showstopper, so it doesn't deserve to be classified as a normal priority report. > submitters should essentially add to the audit trail or > close bugs which cannot be reproduced anymore > (maybe) very little else. Submitters should not be allowed to close bug reports themselves, otherwise it will wreak havoc. They should explain the reasons and ask somebody with sufficient credentials to do it on their behalf. Last, but not least, I wolud like to apologise you and Dave for unnecessary investigation of the first part of PR42880, which was obviously my fault. Best regards Piotr Wyderski
