On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: > In any case, keep in mind that constexpr are not available yet, maybe the > parser can already recognize some uses but the semantics is not done yet. Ah, so it was nothing but smokes & mirrors. Thanks for the clarification.
- g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and interrogatio... tbp
- Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and int... Paolo Carlini
- Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and... tbp
- Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment... Dave Korn
- Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappoint... Xinliang David Li
- Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disap... Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disap... Dave Korn
- Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user d... tbp
- Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-us... Dave Korn
- Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-us... Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: g++ 4.5.0, end-user disappointment and int... Xinliang David Li