Re: Crucial C++ inlining broken under -Os

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Joern Rennecke <amyl...@spamcop.net> writes:

> [...]  But if the function is very simple, the only reason to keep
> it would be if its address was taken somewhere, or if we tailcall
> it.

... or to make it available from gdb as an inferior call.

- FChE