On 2010-11-27, 16:37:07 -0800, James Dennett <james.denn...@gmail.com> wrote: > 4.6 appears to be right -- you cannot bind an X&& to a const X (which > is good, as otherwise you could change the const X).
Should this one emit the same error then? 4.6 compiles it. typedef int X; X test() { X const& a={}; return std::move(a); } Thanks