> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Jack Howarth <howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu> > wrote: >> Sebastian, >> It appears that the official tarballs are now posted at >> http://www.cloog.org/ >> for cloog and cloog-parma 0.16. Do you plan on placing those both in the >> infrastructure >> directory at gcc.gnu.org's ftp site? If so, the newer ppl 0.11 tarball >> should be added >> as well. If those files are updated, we should be set to switch gcc >> trunk to require >> ppl >= 0.11, cloog >= 0.16 and the default cloog backend from legacy >> cloog-ppl to >> cloog-isl. > > I don't think this is a very good idea at this point.
I think ppl is in a stae of change and between releases. I have not yet seen it compile cleanly once with any version of GCC on Solaris. It certainly never passes its own testsuites without a coredump or some significant failure. Roberto Bagnara is aware of this and I am going to work with him on this to get something valid in the POSIX/UNIX world and hopefully a new release of ppl will come out that is solid for integration into GCC. As for ClooG, I have no data at this time. This is merely an observation from someone that tries to be very very careful with testing and with testsuite results. -- Dennis Clarke dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris ps: thus far GCC 4.5.2 is beautiful on Solaris however on Debian Squeeze it seems to be a nightmare. Testsuite has been running for three days on Intel i7 with many many failures. I'll report data when I have it.
