Joern Rennecke wrote:
Quoting Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de>:
Is it ok to extend targetm.function_ok_for_sibcall so that it passes
also a pointer to the callee's CUMULATIVE_ARGS structure?
CUMULATIVE_ARGS is a target-dependent type, and thus every use of it
in the interface of target hooks should be considered a bug.
See PR46500.
Thanks for pointing me to that thread.
So the question is if such an extension would be okay in principle after
cumulative_args_t, or whatever it will eventually be, has found it's way
into mainline?
Johann
