On 08/09/11 12:33, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 07:16, Richard Guenther > <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Well, you'd need to maintain a list of known XPASS/FAILs anyway. > > Yes, of course. That's the manifest of things you expect to be broken. >
And that's only going to work if all the test names are unique. I currently see quite a few tests that appear in my log as both PASS and FAIL in a single run. For example: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-2.c -Os execution test PASS: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-2.c -Os execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/setjmp-3.c -Os execution test PASS: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/setjmp-3.c -Os execution test R.
