[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Declaring the parameter above as ‘int x[a]’ is valid C99. I fail to see
> why this is insufficient for the purposes we discussed. Could you clarify?
Sorry, I hadn't realized that C99 permitted that. The standard does
clearly state that in prototype scope it is treated as '*', so according
to the standard
f(int a, int x[static a]);
is equivalent to
f(int a, int x[static *]);
which is not helpful. Still, you are probably right that it would be
reasonable to extend gcc's support of this.
Ian
