On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Bin.Cheng <amker.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> Following is the tree dump of 094t.pre for a test program. >> Question is loads of D.5375_12/D.5375_14 are redundant on path <bb2, >> bb7, bb5, bb6>, >> but why not lowered into basic block 3, where it is used. >> >> BTW, seems no tree pass handles this case currently. > > tree-ssa-sink.c should do this. > It does not work for me, I will double check and update soon.
-- Best Regards.