On 11/04/2012 09:50, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-04-09 13:03:38 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
>>> On 4/9/2012 1:36 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe -Wstandard isn't the best name though, as "standard" usually
>>>> means something quite specific for compilers, and the warning switch
>>>> wouldn't have anything to do with standards conformance.
>>> -Wdefault
>>>
>>> might be better
>> except if people want warnings about "defaults" in C++11 (which can mean
>> lot of things).
>
> How about a warning level?
>
> -W0: no warnings (equivalent to -w)
> -W1: default
> -W2: equivalent to the current -Wall
> -W3: equivalent to the current -Wall -Wextra
I like this suggestion a lot.
cheers,
DaveK
