On 3 June 2012 01:30, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > After reading up further, it appears that the possibility exists that the > script may 'fix' things in the libc headers that we don't want or need > 'fixed'. I'm trying to ascertain what things the script in particular is > 'fixing' and which way is more technically sound in our build scenario.
It's trivial to let it run and compare the fixed files to the originals. On my system with a recent glibc I still see lots of changes to limits.h, I assume they're not pointless and are worth having.
