> On 06/13/2013 12:35 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > >On 06/13/2013 12:28 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>these FAILs are much more recent but frankly I'm also puzzled: > >>is a fix actively in the making? Do we have any sort of time for > >>that? > >This is PR57548 and a patch is approved but unapplied: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00426.html > > > >I'll do that myself ASAP if nobody beats me. > In fact the patch is already in but the regressions are still there, eg: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-06/msg01257.html > > Is it actually a different issue or what?
I looked into it and it is caused at least the mv1 is caused by loop preserving code. tree-inline expects loops to be build (and by Richard it should be the case) but they are not. I did not work out yet why it is the case, if time allows I iwll try to look into it tonight or tomorrow. Honza > > Paolo.
