Re: TYPE_BINFO and canonical types at LTO

[Jason Merrill]

On 02/17/2014 03:55 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
I also think we want explicit representation of types known to be local to 
compilation
unit - anonymous namespaces in C/C++, types defined within function bodies in C 
and
god knows what in Ada/Fortran/Java.

In the C++ front end we set TREE_PUBLIC appropriately on the TYPE_DECL 
of a named type.

Jason