gcc  

Messages by Thread

• git gcc-verify question Jerry D via Gcc
  • Re: git gcc-verify question Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-12-20250213 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Sourceware Open Valentine Office Friday, Feb 14, 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc
  • Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc
  • Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc
  • Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc
• [no subject] Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc
  • Re: Tobias Hunger via Gcc
  • Re: Modules deprecation rumors Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• Inbound Caller left (3) VM MSG 00:0430 DURATION-0da4d5e134752a5ecc311012c1cfef2e Call_Service-PlayBack_transit.securedata.com.securecloud.packetflow.net*ju757849*2526a5lki887?*9936928987656789876567898764f4-mail.protect.outlook.commx.box615bfe9fc949fcccc54392c416c2fe0a-a8d90738fc1ae1d2fe925d1623e943a0mx.01-
• gcc-15-20250209 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• How "()" works and why саша савельев
  • Re: How "()" works and why Nicholas Vinson via Gcc
  • Re: How "()" works and why Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Jerry D via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Andre Vehreschild via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Sam James via Gcc
• Classes Implicitly Declared Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc
  • Re: Classes Implicitly Declared Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Classes Implicitly Declared Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc
  • Re: Classes Implicitly Declared Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Classes Implicitly Declared Nathaniel Shead via Gcc
  • Re: Classes Implicitly Declared Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: Classes Implicitly Declared Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• gcc-14-20250208 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• , Welcome to the formation of the IWACCE 2025 session! IWACCE 2025 via Gcc
• [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Nelson Chu
  • Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Palmer Dabbelt
  • Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Nelson Chu
  • Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Nelson Chu
  • Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Fangrui Song
  • Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Nelson Chu
  • Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Fangrui Song
  • Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Nelson Chu
• gcc-13-20250207 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [wwwdocs] cannot access from brazil Paulo Almeida via Gcc
  • Re: [wwwdocs] cannot access from brazil Mark Wielaard
• On master, with checking=all, I get dozens of fails for g++, already for months on end. Toon Moene
  • Re: On master, with checking=all, I get dozens of fails for g++, already for months on end. Nathaniel Shead via Gcc
  • Re: On master, with checking=all, I get dozens of fails for g++, already for months on end. Toon Moene
• gcc-12-20250206 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• US mirror sites missing newer versions Michael Leuchtenburg via Gcc
• GCC Steering Committee attention, Re: [WIP 0/8] Algol 68 GCC Front-End Thomas Schwinge
• Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC JohnyTheCarrot via Gcc
  • Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC JohnyTheCarrot via Gcc
  • Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC Basile Starynkevitch
  • Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC JohnyTheCarrot via Gcc
  • Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC David Malcolm via Gcc
• GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Geeta Dora via Gcc
  • Re: GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Geeta Dora via Gcc
  • Re: GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Geeta Dora via Gcc
  • GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Geeta Dora via Gcc
• gcc-15-20250202 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Andreas Schwab via Gcc
  • Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Marc Poulhiès via Gcc
  • Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Jeff Law via Gcc
• gcc-14-20250201 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20250131 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [wwwdocs] a bug report about some deprecated parts of gcc noname noname via Gcc
  • Re: [wwwdocs] a bug report about some deprecated parts of gcc noname noname via Gcc
  • Re: [wwwdocs] a bug report about some deprecated parts of gcc David Brown
  • Re: [wwwdocs] a bug report about some deprecated parts of gcc Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [wwwdocs] a bug report about some deprecated parts of gcc David Brown
• ELF2.0: Linkable struct The Cuthour via Gcc
  • Re: ELF2.0: Linkable struct Oleg Endo via Gcc
  • Re: ELF2.0: Linkable struct The Cuthour via Gcc
  • Re: ELF2.0: Linkable struct Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: ELF2.0: Linkable struct The Cuthour via Gcc
  • Re: ELF2.0: Linkable struct Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: ELF2.0: Linkable struct The Cuthour via Gcc
  • Re: ELF2.0: Linkable struct Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: ELF2.0: Linkable struct The Cuthour via Gcc
  • Re: ELF2.0: Linkable struct Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc
  • Re: ELF2.0: Linkable struct Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• New risc-v builder.sourceware.org CI workers (p550 and bpi-f3) Mark Wielaard
• gcc-12-20250130 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• On -Wmaybe-uninitialized Dmitry Antipov
  • Re: On -Wmaybe-uninitialized Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: On -Wmaybe-uninitialized David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: On -Wmaybe-uninitialized Dmitry Antipov
  • Re: On -Wmaybe-uninitialized Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: On -Wmaybe-uninitialized Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: On -Wmaybe-uninitialized Richard Biener via Gcc
• GCC GSoC 2025: Call for project ideas and mentors Martin Jambor
  • Re: GCC GSoC 2025: Call for project ideas and mentors Martin Jambor
• gcc-15-20250126 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20250125 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20250124 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-12-20250123 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Gay for Good: Please Confirm Subscription Gay for Good via Gcc
• [no subject] Areij Farah via Gcc
• [[gnu::malloc()]] on inline functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• Sanitizer CHECK failed: sanitizer_allocator_primary64.h:133 JerryXie via Gcc
• GCC15: Typos in gcc/BASE-VER Chris Clayton via Gcc
  • Re: GCC15: Typos in gcc/BASE-VER Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-15-20250119 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• small install.texi error James K. Lowden
• gcc-14-20250118 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Re: bug in gcc/cp/coroutines.cc line 4688 Lee Brown via Gcc
  • Re: bug in gcc/cp/coroutines.cc line 4688 Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: bug in gcc/cp/coroutines.cc line 4688 Lee Brown via Gcc
  • Re: bug in gcc/cp/coroutines.cc line 4688 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• [SPARC] Fix PR target/118512 Eric Botcazou via Gcc
• Question about optimizing dynamic_cast call in C++ at GIMPLE Level Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about optimizing dynamic_cast call in C++ at GIMPLE Level Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Question about optimizing dynamic_cast call in C++ at GIMPLE Level Hanke Zhang via Gcc
• gcc-13-20250117 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-12-20250116 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Ihor Solodrai via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Ihor Solodrai via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Ihor Solodrai via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Ihor Solodrai via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Cupertino Miranda via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Andrii Nakryiko via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Ihor Solodrai via Gcc
  • Re: Announcement: GCC BPF is now being tested on BPF CI Sam James via Gcc
• Defining __uint24 Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc
  • Re: Defining __uint24 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Defining __uint24 Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc
  • Re: Defining __uint24 Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Defining __uint24 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Defining __uint24 Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Defining __uint24 Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc
  • Re: Defining __uint24 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Optimizing codegen for absolute differences in AArch64 Jennifer Schmitz via Gcc
  • Re: Optimizing codegen for absolute differences in AArch64 Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Optimizing codegen for absolute differences in AArch64 Jennifer Schmitz via Gcc
• Testsuite generator script Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
  • Re: Testsuite generator script Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Testsuite generator script Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
• GCC 15.0.0 Status Report (2025-01-13), Stage 4 in effect NOW Richard Biener via Gcc
• Help for git send-email setting Hao Liu via Gcc
  • Re: Help for git send-email setting Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: Help for git send-email setting Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Help for git send-email setting Andrew Stubbs
• gcc-15-20250112 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20250111 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20250110 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• diagnostic framework message array James K. Lowden
  • Re: diagnostic framework message array David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: diagnostic framework message array David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: diagnostic framework message array James K. Lowden
• gcc-12-20250109 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Sourceware Open Office Friday, Jan 10, 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• Questions about macro fusion pass Hau Hsu via Gcc
  • Re: Questions about macro fusion pass Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: Questions about macro fusion pass Hau Hsu via Gcc
• RFC: Link-time resolved constant The Cuthour via Gcc
• Link-time resolved constant The Cuthour via Gcc
  • Re: Link-time resolved constant Trampas Stern via Gcc
  • Re: Link-time resolved constant The Cuthour via Gcc
  • Re: Link-time resolved constant Trampas Stern via Gcc
  • Re: Link-time resolved constant The Cuthour via Gcc
• RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Andreas Schwab
  • Re: RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Leave preprocessed files on ICE Andreas Schwab via Gcc
• Alignment of `complex double` M Chhapgar via Gcc
  • Re: Alignment of `complex double` Jonathan Wakely via Gcc

• Earlier messages
• Later messages