On 10/04/16 08:35, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 07:40:09AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/03/16 19:48, Martin Sebor wrote:
In a recent review Jason and I discussed the style convention
commonly followed in the C++ front end to annotate arguments
in calls to functions taking bool parameters with a comment
along the lines of
foo (1, 2, /*bar_p=*/true);
I like this if there's more than one boolean arg. If there's only one, I'm
ambivalent.
It often is more readable and natural to have a separate "foo_bar"
function for "bar_p = true" (inline perhaps) than to use default
arguments, after which all these comment workarounds go away.
I take it you've not looked at the c++ parser :)
static cp_expr cp_parser_unqualified_id
(cp_parser *, bool, bool, bool, bool);
combinatorial explosion time
nathan
