Hi, while testing a patch to fix PR81444, I came across a new FAIL due
to the patch in i386.c/pr71321.c
PR81444 is about wrong modes used by expmed.c as it computes costs for
widening operations like widening mul. It uses GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE
for the wider mode where is should use GET_MODE_2XWIDER_MODE (the
internals specify a mode 2 times as wide for the wider mode).
Applying the patch from below then leads to the following change in
code generated for PR71321.c:
Without patch:
cvt_to_2digit_ascii:
movzbl %dil, %eax # 7 *zero_extendqihi2/1 [length = 4]
leal (%rax,%rax,4), %edx # 46 *leasi [length = 3]
leal (%rax,%rdx,8), %edx # 47 *leasi [length = 3]
leal (%rdx,%rdx,4), %edx # 48 *leasi [length = 3]
shrw $11, %dx # 16 *lshrhi3_1 [length = 4]
leal (%rdx,%rdx,4), %eax # 49 *leasi [length = 3]
movzbl %dl, %edx # 35 *zero_extendqisi2/1 [length = 3]
addl %eax, %eax # 50 *ashlsi3_1/1 [length = 2]
subl %eax, %edi # 51 *subsi_1/1 [length = 2]
movzbl %dil, %eax # 23 *zero_extendqisi2/1 [length = 4]
sall $8, %eax # 24 *ashlsi3_1/1 [length = 3]
orl %edx, %eax # 36 *iorsi_1/1 [length = 2]
addl $667696, %eax # 37 *addsi_1/1 [length = 5]
ret # 55 simple_return_internal [length = 1]
With patch applied:
cvt_to_2digit_ascii:
movl $-51, %edx # 7 *movqi_internal/2 [length = 5]
movl %edx, %eax # 35 *movqi_internal/1 [length = 2]
mulb %dil # 8 *umulqihi3_1 [length = 3]
movl %eax, %edx # 36 *movhi_internal/1 [length = 2]
(Following code is the same)
shrw $11, %dx # 10 *lshrhi3_1 [length = 4]
leal (%rdx,%rdx,4), %eax # 37 *leasi [length = 3]
movzbl %dl, %edx # 23 *zero_extendqisi2/1 [length = 3]
addl %eax, %eax # 38 *ashlsi3_1/1 [length = 2]
subl %eax, %edi # 39 *subsi_1/1 [length = 2]
movzbl %dil, %eax # 17 *zero_extendqisi2/1 [length = 4]
sall $8, %eax # 18 *ashlsi3_1/1 [length = 3]
orl %edx, %eax # 24 *iorsi_1/1 [length = 2]
addl $667696, %eax # 25 *addsi_1/1 [length = 5]
ret # 43 simple_return_internal [length = 1]
Is this actually a performance regression or did the code improve
actually? (compiled with -O2 on x86_64).
What would be the proposed fix: Adjust the test case or is this some
problem in the i386.c cost computation?
Johann
Index: expmed.c
===================================================================
--- expmed.c (revision 250090)
+++ expmed.c (working copy)
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ init_expmed_one_conv (struct init_expmed
{
int to_size, from_size;
rtx which;
+ machine_mode orig_mode = GET_MODE (all->reg);
to_size = GET_MODE_PRECISION (to_mode);
from_size = GET_MODE_PRECISION (from_mode);
@@ -140,6 +141,8 @@ init_expmed_one_conv (struct init_expmed
PUT_MODE (all->reg, from_mode);
set_convert_cost (to_mode, from_mode, speed,
set_src_cost (which, to_mode, speed));
+ // Unclobber the mode, callers still use it.
+ PUT_MODE (all->reg, orig_mode);
}
static void
@@ -210,7 +213,7 @@ init_expmed_one_mode (struct init_expmed
}
if (GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_INT)
{
- machine_mode wider_mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode);
+ machine_mode wider_mode = GET_MODE_2XWIDER_MODE (mode);
if (wider_mode != VOIDmode)
{
PUT_MODE (all->zext, wider_mode);
