On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:56 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Cory Fields <li...@coryfields.com> wrote: >> After looking at this for quite a while, I'm afraid I'm unsure how to >> proceed. >> >> As of now, static and static-pie are mutually exclusive. So given the >> GNU_USER_TARGET_STARTFILE_SPEC you pasted >> earlier, "static" matches before "static-pie", causing the wrong start files. >> >> It seems to me that the static-pie target complicates things more than >> matching against static+pie individually. >> >> If I convert -static + -pie to -static-pie, then "static" won't be >> matched in specs, where maybe it otherwise should. Same for -pie. >> >> Would you prefer to swallow -static and -pie and pass along only >> -static-pie? Or forward them all along, and fix the specs which look > > Yes. When you see both -static and -pie. regardless of their relative > order on command-line, you > > 1. Remove -static and -pie. > 2. Add -static-pie. >
This assumes that -static -pie and -pie -static do not produce the working executable. If they do, you can't change them. -- H.J.
