Re: ChangeLog's: do we have to?

[Paul Koning]

> On Jul 5, 2018, at 10:43 AM, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> 
> * Aldy Hernandez:
> 
>> Can someone refresh my memory here, what are the remaining arguments for 
>> requiring ChangeLog entries?
> 
> ChangeLog entries are part of the review, commit messages are not, so
> you end up with surprises there.  At least that's what happens in
> glibc.

That issue could be fixed easily by having the proposed commit message 
reviewed.  That's approximately what we have today since the commit message is 
basically the change log entry, with perhaps another sentence or two.

        paul