On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 03:04:53PM +0000, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Arvind Sankar wrote: > > > => x->is_a (REG) > > Oh god, please no. Currently at least the RTL parts of GCC still have > mostly a consistent and obvious style, which is a good thing. I have no > idea why anyone would think the above is easier to read than REG_P (x). > > > Ciao, > Michael. > P.S: Consider this: the current style served us quite well for the last 35 > or so years, so before suggesting style changes, shouldn't you first work > on the sources for some time?
Well, the main point of the email was to ask for review of a patchset that attempts to make progress on a TODO that has been outstanding for at least 15 of those 35 years.
