On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 15:37, Jiang Ma <majiang31...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the kindly reply! > > It would create a non-standard, non-portable dialect of C++. We prefer > > to avoid adding non-standard extensions these days. You could propose > >it to the C++ committee, but I'm pretty sure they would not want such > >a thing. > Indeed, pragma is not portable. I believe you are right that the > C++ committee would not want such a thing :-)
I mean they wouldn't want it under any syntax, not just as a pragma. It's a terrible fit for a pragma anyway.
