On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 13:38, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 08:01 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2021, 07:50 pawel k. via Gcc, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > [...snip...] > > > Very logical argument, thanks for sharing. > > Jonathan, it's clear to me that you're being sarcastic, but it might > not be clear to others. Please avoid sarcasm - it amplifies > misunderstanding on the internet, and it seems to me that that's > counterproductive when discussing a sensitive topic.
For the avoidance of doubt, I was being sarcastic. I didn't think it was a logical argument, I thought it was one of the worst so far in this whole clownshow. > I disagree with much of what Pawel wrote, but this discussion has left > me feeling drained. I don't have the mental energy to do a point-by- > point response, and I don't think it would be a productive thing to > post to this mailing list. Which is why I went for sarcasm instead.
