On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:10 AM Gary Oblock via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > This is one of those things that has always puzzled > me so I thought I break down and finally ask. > > There are two ways a memory reference (tree) prints: > > MEM[(struct arc_t *)_684].flow > > and > > _684->flow > > Poking under the hood of them, the tree codes and > operands are identical so what am I missing?
Try dumping with -gimple, that should show you the difference. > > Thanks, > > Gary > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information that > is confidential and proprietary to Ampere Computing or its subsidiaries. It > is to be used solely for the purpose of furthering the parties' business > relationship. Any unauthorized review, copying, or distribution of this email > (or any attachments thereto) is strictly prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently > delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
