On 12/7/22 10:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022, 02:30 chuanqi.xcq via Gcc, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org
<mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>> wrote:
\
(2) If (1) is not acceptable and we love to keep the command line
consistency, I think clang can use '-fmodule-output=' as long as we make it
clear in the document. It will be confusing but it may be the cost clang
need to pay for the extension (so I'll vote against strongly if someone want
to add some other extensions)
Given that C++20 modules are in an ISO standard and clang modules aren't, I
think it's right that the "simple" name refers to C++20 modules, without
requiring "std-c++-modules". It also seems right that the difficulty of
distinguishing clang modules from std modules should be dealt with by clang, not
by other compilers.
Wait, why does clang want different options to specify the name of the
clang-module file vs a C++ module file? It's only in one mode at a time isn't
it? And that mode is controlled by other options. It cannot generate both in a
single compilation, right?
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
