Andrew wrote:

It's better to use a meaningful subject. Just the name of the application you're talking about isn't sufficient.

Hi,

I've really been enjoying Firefox on the Iyonix and it's proved essential for accessing information I couldn't have done otherwise. Is it possible to ask what further plans do you have for it?

I'm not sure what kind of answer you're expecting.  Certainly I
don't make a habit (with some exceptions) of announcing stuff
I haven't done yet.

Ultimately, Firefox remains almost entirely my own work.  Unless
there's additional help, any improvements are likely to be
slow/non-existent.

In any case, the biggest problem facing RISC OS is not really
any specific application issues, but rather over turning
years old myths "flash based browser", "multimedia" or
even admitting that RISC OS has some serious problems, or
even getting a straight answer out of ROL.

At such a time that we're willing to admit that we have
problems, we might actually be in a position to set
realistic goals and start tackling some of them.

In the meantime, at least, one of the biggest practical
challenges is packaging; that at least is coming along,
if slowly.


_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list [email protected]
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK

Reply via email to