On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 07:25:23PM +0000, Robert Heaton wrote: > I've updated to SVN r5480, now when I try and build wget, I get this error; > > Autobuilder: Using existing Sources.bz2 (stable/contrib) > Autobuilder: Directory name not found in Sources.bz2 (testing/main) > Autobuilder: Trying Binary entry > 2011-12-17 19:22:45 > URL:http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/p11-kit/p11-kit_0.8.orig.tar.gz > [528732/528732] -> "p11-kit_0.8.orig.tar.gz" [1] > 2011-12-17 19:22:45 > URL:http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/p11-kit/ [11754] -> > "index.html" [1] > gzip: *.diff.gz: No such file or directory
That's a red herring, I think. > Hunk #1 FAILED at 35. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 46 (offset 2 lines). > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tools/p11-kit.c.rej > Autobuilder: RISC OS patch: > /home/robheaton/Downloads/gccsdk/autobuilder/libraries/libp11-kit0/modules.c.p > patching file p11-kit/modules.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 253. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file p11-kit/modules.c.rej These mean that the patches are out of sync with the upstream sources. Someone needs to port the patches to the newer upstream code (probably fairly simple; something has changed which means patch can't detect where to change the source files). The patches are *.p files in autobuilder/libraries/libp11-kit0/ But my build continues... I get as far as it configuring and starting to build, until: CC hashmap.lo CC modules.lo modules.c: In function 'dlopen_and_get_function_list': modules.c:265:19: error: 'RTLD_LOCAL' undeclared (first use in this function) modules.c:265:19: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in make[2]: *** [modules.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/store/riscos/gccsdk/autobuilder-tmp/libp11-kit0/p11-kit-0.8/p11-kit' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/store/riscos/gccsdk/autobuilder-tmp/libp11-kit0/p11-kit-0.8' make: *** [all] Error 2 Package libp11-kit0: ***Failure*** Build for package "libp11-kit0" failed ...which look related to the patches. At a first glance, it looks like the modules.c patch is no longer needed, and the p11-kit.c patch needs some minor tweaks. Theo _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list [email protected] Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
