In article
<cahqjq4joy3+y5mnr5ktdjfd76my88feh9qdoxfw25ch9td9...@mail.gmail.com>,
   Robert Heaton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Autobuilder: Package "dpkg" will be built using rules at
> "/home/robheaton/Downloads/gccsdk/autobuilder/cli/dpkg"
> Autobuilder: Dependency libbz2-1.0 satisfied by previous successful build
> Autobuilder: No match for Debian dependency "libselinux1" - ignoring
> Autobuilder: Dependency zlib1g satisfied by previous successful build
> Autobuilder: Package "coreutils" will be built using rules at
> "/home/robheaton/Downloads/gccsdk/autobuilder/cli/coreutils"
> Autobuilder: Package "dpkg" will be built using rules at
> "/home/robheaton/Downloads/gccsdk/autobuilder/cli/dpkg"
> Autobuilder: Dependency libbz2-1.0 satisfied by previous successful build
> Autobuilder: No match for Debian dependency "libselinux1" - ignoring
> Autobuilder: Dependency zlib1g satisfied by previous successful build
> Autobuilder: Package "coreutils" will be built using rules at
> "/home/robheaton/Downloads/gccsdk/autobuilder/cli/coreutils"
> Autobuilder: Package "dpkg" will be built using rules at
> "/home/robheaton/Downloads/gccsdk/autobuilder/cli/dpkg"

Looks like there is a circular dependancy with coreutils and dpkg. As a
temporary workaround you could 'touch autobuidler/cli/dpkg/last-success'
and build coreutils and dpkg manually. You'll also need to update to r5492
of the autobuilder first.

Chris.

-- 
Email: [email protected]

_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list [email protected]
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK

Reply via email to