Greetings! Yes, we will alas need a cleanup 2.6.14 release in the immediate future. In general I like the lifetime of releases to be long, but in this case we released assuming the current gcc had a bug that needed fixing, and only found out after release that the behavior was deliberate. We cannot leave a gcl stable out there long term which is incompatible with the latest gcc. I am just waiting on ftp-upl...@gnu.org to sort out the signature issues before proceeding. In the meantime, please report any 2.6.14pre show stoppers asap.
Take care, > On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 10:10 AM Camm Maguire <c...@maguirefamily.org> wrote: > > Greetings! Correct -- my upload was rejected for an as yet undetermined > signature verification failure. I am corresponding with them about it, > and received my first reply yesterday..... > > Will there be an updated version of 2.6.13 that includes a fix for gcc 12? > Or do I have to wait for 2.6.14? If the latter, it would be nice to have > that released soon; I'd like to be able to build maxima > with a released version of gcl instead of some random commit of gcl that has > the fix. > > Take care, > > Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> writes: -- Camm Maguire c...@maguirefamily.org ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
