Hi Joel- >I'd like to know how I may get better performance reading a KML file. I have >a >file with 9,640 points. I've found that it takes about 16 seconds to read >>through the entire file (see the code snapshot below). The exact same data >in >Shapefile format takes a second or less to read using the same code >>snippet. I'm using 1.5.2 with libexpat. Any hints? Thanks.
I think there are few problems here. One is that XML is inherently slow. Second, it looks as though the getFeature code is looping through each child incrementally. I'm more familiar with libXML2 than expat and sadly I'm not aware of xpath functionality for expat (mainly because it's a sax parser). I would bet that writing an xpath query to grab the nth placemark (and allowing the underlying xml engine to execute it) would be much faster than looping over all the children of the layer. I don't know of a quick solution at this time, but it would be good to get a copy of your sample data (if possible) and file a ticket against it... -Chris Christopher Condit San Diego Supercomputer Center 858-822-5483 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
