Upon reflection, I think we should congregate these utilities into a
single utility -- gdaldem (I'm totally flexible on the name -- and
have each be a separate operation within that rather than
proliferating five more GDAL utilities.
-- http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2640
I like the idea of gdaldem with commands rather than seperate utilities.
For some time I've considered proprosing that we do the same with gdal
so that `merge`, `warp`, `translate`, etc. become commands to a single
gdal utility. Ditto for ogr. I've hesitated because there is so much
inertia (and I'd be asking others to do work that I can't!).
matt wilkie
--------------------------------------------
Geomatics Analyst
Information Management and Technology
Yukon Department of Environment
10 Burns Road * Whitehorse, Yukon * Y1A 4Y9
867-667-8133 Tel * 867-393-7003 Fax
http://environmentyukon.gov.yk.ca/geomatics/
--------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
