Are you doing any version-dependent actions, or just checking for one of three versions? If not, then yes, I'd say take the namespace requirement out.
Roger -- On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Would it make sense to relax a bit the KML driver here [1] so it > accepts <kml> root without xmlns attribute? > > One user reported to me that he is not able to read this file [2] > using OGR KML driver and I found this is because of missing xmlns in > <kml> root element. The KML was produced by some unknown > software shipped with some GPS logger. > > I'm wondering if there are more KML generators in use that > produce <kml> element without xmlns attribute. > > > [1] > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/browser/trunk/gdal/ogr/ogrsf_frmts/kml/kml.cpp#L268 > [2] http://mateusz.loskot.net/tmp/gdal/no-xmlns.kml > > Best regards, > -- > Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net > Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
