Now, I want to use a new enhancement which is not compile by defaut. So I have downloaded trunk sources, compiled the files and so I have a local user library (which is so in /usr/local/lib directory).

I'm using unstable trunk library ! Yes, I 'm using new enhancement ! I shall discover new bugs ! Yes, I should eradicate these !

It may be the open's magic. Elsewhere, I must wait and just ask when such feature will be released, and I will have to pay the library...


New early releases might be useless. Be patient.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Klaric" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] 1.7 release date


On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Even Rouault <[email protected]
wrote:


1.7 release date hasn't been decided yet. There is no precise criterion to
determine when it happens : it depends mainly on when RFC or major work
planned by developers have been implemented. But if you look at the release
date of previous "major" versions (1.6.0 ~ 04-Dec-2008, 1.5.0 ~
20-Dec-2007,
1.4.0 ~ 5-Jan-2007), you could expect 1.7.0 for the end of 2009.


Good to know.



Depending on the bug fix (which one are you refering to ? ticket number,
SVN
revision), it could be considered to be backported into the next
maintenance
version of the 1.6.x branch. But 1.6.1 has been released just a few weeks
ago, so 1.6.2 won't likely be released before a few months.


I'm looking at ticket #2989.  See: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2989

I'll likely end up creating a patch for my gentoo ebuild unless this gets
backported into a 1.6.2 release.  It's tough to deal with some of the new,
large GeoEye-1 scenes without this fix.

Thanks,
Matt



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to