Martin Dobias wrote: > Hi, > > As there have been no further comments on RFC 29, I would like to call > for vote on it: > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc29_desired_fields >
+0 I understand the need and do not have a better solution to offer unfortunately. The proposed RFC seems to be the best we could come up with, but I still wish we could have found a cleaner way to handle this. -- Daniel Morissette http://www.mapgears.com/ _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
