> -------Original Message------- > From: Ari Jolma <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 2.0 Notes > Sent: Sep 23 '10 09:04 > > On 09/22/2010 09:52 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: > > Folks, > > > > In IRC I was just mentioning to Howard that we might want to drop use of > > CPL_STDCALL in the GDAL API if a 2.0 release ever occurs. It seemed > > to me > > that such ideas ought to be kept track of so off the "Developer" > > section of > > the Trac wiki I have created a page for this and pre-populated it with > > a few > > items. Please feel free to add other cleanup suitable to do at such an > > ABI breaking version. > > > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GDAL20Changes > > > > As we are running out of 1.x numbers (1.8.0 hopfully coming out soon) > > We can always have 1.10 and 1.11 etc. That would not be uncommon (there > is for example Perl 5.10 as we're waiting for Perl 6). However, I'm for
I like that. > having 2.0, not just because numbers ran out but because that would be a > chance to do something a bit more major. One idea would be to make a > general call for new ideas and wish lists. But maybe the support for UNICODE could be considered a major change. No? IMHO, Ivan > > Best regards, > > Ari > > > , I'm > > thinking about a 2.0 release for something like the fall of 2012 - > > just in > > time for the world to end. > > > > Best regards, > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
