Hi On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Simone Giannecchini <[email protected]> wrote: > Ciao Even, > I have asked daniele to make those changes (which have not been reviewed yet) > in order to move away from the explicit usage of Vector and HashTable in > method > signatures in favour of using the respective interfaces (List and Map). > Daniele can add more as needed... > > As you mentioned this change can break old code, but it should > make the java bindings more ... javaish :). > > We have other changes in the queue which we might submit to your review > early next year, but this is another topic... > > > Viji , I don't think you need to use the patch you are referring to since > that is needed for imageio-ext 1.1 which has not been released yet. > The latest (and greatest) is 1.0.8 which uses an older gdal version.
We are trying to package the SVN version of imageio 1.1 (r1236) with GDAL 1.7.3. I haven't tried the GDAL 1.7.3 with imageio 1.0.8 yet. Thanks Viji > > Ciao, > Simone. > ------------------------------------------------------- > Ing. Simone Giannecchini > GeoSolutions S.A.S. > Founder > > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 > 55054 Massarosa (LU) > Italy > > phone: +39 0584962313 > fax: +39 0584962313 > mob: +39 333 8128928 > > > http://www.geo-solutions.it > http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ > http://www.linkedin.com/in/simonegiannecchini > http://twitter.com/simogeo > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Even Rouault > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Viji, >> >> I maintain the GDAL Java bindings, but the image-io GDAL plugin is another >> project whose maintener is Daniele I think. He'll correct me if I'm wrong, >> but >> I saw his name on http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ImageIO-EXT+GDAL >> ;-) . I've CC'ed him so he has a chance to comment and explain the rational >> of >> the patch. >> >> I wasn't aware of this patch. I've skimmed through it quickly, and it seems >> that it only replaces old-fashionned data structures like Vector to use more >> trendish ArrayList + Java 1.5 generics. Well, this is certainly not a bad >> idea >> (something to consider for GDAL 2.0 ?), but I fail to see why it was >> *necessary* . I'm not particularly keen on applying this patch in GDAL >> mainline as it changes the API of the Java bindings, thus breaking working >> code of other users. I fail to see why ImageIO-EXT cannot use the existing >> API, even if it is perhaps not as convenient as it could be if it was using >> more modern Java API. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Even >> >> Le jeudi 09 décembre 2010 14:18:18, Viji V Nair a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am one of the GDAL co-maintainer for Fedora, I would like to have >>> the image-io extension support, currently it been supported through >>> the following patch from image-io. But I dont think this is a good >>> idea as the modifications are bit heavy. >>> >>> https://imageio-ext.dev.java.net/svn/imageio-ext/trunk/patches/gdal1.7.2.pa >>> tch (Username : guest, Password: guest) >>> >>> Is there any work going on related to this? Please share the ideas >>> >>> Thanks >>> Viji >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gdal-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >> > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
