Back again on this I have talked with Markus Neteler and he told me that if I use gdalwarp with NN method, I will get a pixel shift and he suggested me to use bilinear method. The problem with bilinear is that my pixel values are changed (based on bilinear method) So is there any method to keep the pixels values and without any pixel position shift? Thanks
Best regards, Luisa 2011/3/23 Luisa Peña <[email protected]> > For now GDAL15 (the one that comes with winGRASS GIS) and GDAL16 binary. > Why? > (I have sent this to the wrong mailing list) > > >> Why? >> >> >> >> 2011/3/22 Kyle Shannon <[email protected]> >> >>> What version of gdal are you using? >>> >>> # ============================ >>> Kyle Shannon >>> Physical Science Technician >>> RMRS Fire Sciences Lab >>> Fire, Fuels & Smoke - RWU 4405 >>> 5775 Highway 10 W. >>> Missoula, MT 59808 >>> (406)829-6954 >>> [email protected] >>> # ============================ >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 15:36, Luisa Peña <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Greetings >>>> >>>> I have sent an message a couple of days ago ( >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2011-March/028124.html) about >>>> this >>>> I used gdalwarp with this formulation >>>> gdalpwarp -t_srs <EPSG> -tr 30 30 input.tif output.tif >>>> Well it works fine but It seems to be with a deviation of half pixel on >>>> Latitude and half pixel on Longitude when compared with a similar operation >>>> in ARCGis >>>> >>>> Maybe I'm missing some parameter that might be relevant. Any suggestion? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Luisa >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> gdal-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >>>> >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
