Il 16/05/2011 18:38, Frank Warmerdam ha scritto: > On 11-05-16 12:30 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote: >> An alternative solution is to write from scratch the routines for >> decoding of ENVISAT records but this is would require a larger effort. >> >> Again I could try to do it but I would like to receive some sign of >> interest in this feature from GDAL developers before starting to code. > > Antonio, > > I am reasonably willing to incorporate improvements into this driver > if you submit them via ticket as diffs against trunk. >
Yes, of course. Thank you >>> The incidence angles are stored in a small grid at the same size as >>> the GCP´s, (order of 100 elements), which does not fit very nicely >>> into the GDAL datamodel - it would probably have to be stored as a >>> list of metadata strings. >>> >>> Best regards from Knut-Frode >>> >> >> Yes, it is indeed a problem. My feeling is that the currant trend is >> keeping metadata as flat and simple as possible. > > Note, if there is metadata that seems pretty bulky to put in the default > metadata domain, it may make sense to put it in a special metadata > domain. That way it isn't always showing up in gdalinfo reports, and > doesn't get carried along into other formats unnecessarily. OK. Incidence angles grids are indexed with image coordinates so it is a good think, IMHO, to stop their uncontrolled propagation. best regards -- Antonio Valentino _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
