Hi Frank!
There is a bug in the current Envisat driver which could be fixed in 1.8.1.
Not all bands (MDS) are read properly from the MERIS Level 2 imagery.
Below are last lines of the output of
gdalinfo MER_RR__2PNPDK20110502_144833_000024913102_00097_47956_7579.N1
MDSs are numbered from 1 to 13, then 16 and 19. And in the file MDSs
14-15 and 17-18 also exist.
I'm not sure if that's the proper place to report this bug but I just
follow your invitation.
All the best!
Anton
Band 1 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(1)
Band 2 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(2)
Band 3 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(3)
Band 4 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(4)
Band 5 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(5)
Band 6 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(6)
Band 7 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(7)
Band 8 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(8)
Band 9 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(9)
Band 10 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(10)
Band 11 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(11)
Band 12 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(12)
Band 13 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(13)
Band 14 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = YS, SPM, Rect. Rho- MDS(16)
Band 15 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
Description = Alpha, OPT - MDS(19)
On 27/06/2011 14:31, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
I would like to prepare a 1.8.1 release candidate in the next couple
days.
Developers are encouraged to address any bug fixes they would like
promptly.
Is there anything folks feel strongly needs to be addressed in 1.8.1 that
has not yet made it into the 1.8 branch?
Best regards,
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
