On 07/08/2011 07:55 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
below Simon's answer to my answers to his post on the live-demo list :
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/live-demo/2011-July/003653.html
Do you have opinions on how we should handle the licence of documentation on
gdal.org ?
Would it be enough to add something to the Doxyfile tag HTML_FOOTER,
which states what the documentation is? That way it gets to the bottom
of every page of gdal.org. The footer can't be the whole licence,
though. MIT licence does not seem to have a definitive web page and the
wikipedia page states that "MIT Licence" is ambiguous.
Regards,
Ari
Best regards,
Even
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
