> > As PSC chair I will not be offended if you proceed with netcdf changes > > *without* a formal RFC type vote on the changes. The changes are fixing > > bugs and don't cause real backward compatability issues and I'm willing > > to treat you as the authority/owner for the driver. > > OK Frank, many thanks for you support and trust
I also totally share Frank's opinion. All the efforts you have lead seem to have been carefully thought about and are well documented (in the wiki, but frmt_netcdf.html would perhaps need updates). Plus I'd have difficulties to vote for a RFC with an enlightened mind on such a specialized topic ;-) How will you proceed to updating in SVN ? A big code drop, or apply incremental changes ? Personnaly, I tend to prefer micro changes to be able to track regressions more easily, but it might be hard with the workflow you followed using git? I'd note that merging a svn branch in trunk would also loose incremental steps. That's just questions to satisfy my curiosity: I don't ask you to "rewrite history" as they seem to do in Linux kernel development. > > > Best regards, > > -- > > ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------- > > ----- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, > > [email protected] > > light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/warmerda > > and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
