Le mercredi 16 novembre 2011 00:02:24, Etienne Tourigny a écrit : > Even, > > I had tried that as I thought it could be the cause, however: > > I get the same result, although the +towgs84 parameters are set in the > source OGRCT. > > You can see the shapes are identical in size: > -rw------- 1 tourigny tourigny 371684 2011-11-15 20:52 LC_CIDADE_32722.shp > -rw------- 1 tourigny tourigny 371684 2011-11-15 19:35 LC_CIDADE_sad69.shp > -rw------- 1 tourigny tourigny 371684 2011-11-15 19:33 LC_CIDADE.shp > -rw------- 1 tourigny tourigny 371684 2011-11-15 20:46 > LC_CIDADE_wgs84-2.shp
Ah, and you didn't check the result with ogrinfo ? I can a difference when looking at the geometries. There's no reason that the .shp would have different sizes. Reprojection only affects the value of coordinate values, which in .shp are binary double. So whatever its value, a double value uses 8 bytes ;-) _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
