2011/11/27 Even Rouault <[email protected]> > > Hum, when I say *exact*, I really mean *exact* ... And what is interesting > is > the first error emitted by the SRP driver, not the last one in higher > layers. > > I don't remember all errors but the the first two errors from gdalinfo are wrong value G and wrong value E. Names of my files are ok but i didn't check if names was correctly put as data into files. I will get errors tomorrow.
> > > > > As you say Ari, read files with errors is not a good thing. But the > > question for the programmer (like me) is : don't read a map if there is > > just a litlle error in one file or read a map even if there is an error > but > > the raster and data like width, height and georeferencing are readable. > > In my case i have to read these maps. And i'd preffered to load it in the > > dataset java class than get informations with the gdalinfo.exe and build > a > > vrt with Gdalbuildvrt.exe > > Yes if the file is visually OK (is it the case here ?), then errors should > probably reclassified as warnings. > The visual is ok with Qgis. And it works perfectly when i build a vrt file with Gdalbuildvrt from my *.img and make tiles with Gdal_translate.
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
