Selon Kyle Shannon <[email protected]>:

> Hermann,
> I noticed this yesterday too, I don't think the version was updated in the
> trunk after the 1.9 branch.

No, it hasn't been updated. This is a non trivial issue : should it be called
2.0dev or 1.10dev ? ;-)

Even
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to